New Discussion on Türkiye's Agenda: Sezgin Tanrıkulu's Opposition to Privatization

CHP Deputy Chairman Atty.

In the proposal, "Public economic enterprises (SOEs) and strategic public assets, established with great sacrifices throughout the history of the Republic, have been disposed of with aggressive privatization policies implemented since 2002."

“Concern about uncontrolled use of public resources”
Tanrıkulu drew attention to the discussions regarding the audit of the institutions included in the Turkey Wealth Fund, and said, "Keeping the institutions included in the Turkey Wealth Fund away from the Court of Accounts audit deepens the concern about 'uncontrolled use of public resources'."

Request for a “full list” for 2002–2025 privatizations
It was stated in the proposal that a "complete list" of all public assets "privatized, sold or operating rights transferred" by the Privatization Administration or other public institutions between 2002 and 2025 was requested.

The difference between “sales price” and “market valuation report” was asked
Tanrıkulu requested an explanation of the "difference between the Sales Price and the Market Valuation Report determined by independent organizations" for each sales transaction.

Court of Accounts reports and "public harm" determinations are on the agenda
In the proposal, it was requested that the number of transactions determined to be irregularities or "public harm" in the privatization processes in the Court of Accounts audit reports be disclosed.

What items did the revenues “estimated to exceed billion” go to?
Tanrıkulu requested an explanation as to which budget items the revenues obtained from privatizations, "estimated to exceed 70 billion dollars", were transferred to and in which investments they were specifically used.

Wealth Fund companies and audit reports question
In the title regarding public companies transferred to the Turkey Wealth Fund, Tanrıkulu said, "Why are the financial statements and indebtedness of the public companies transferred to the Turkey Wealth Fund (THY, Çaykur, BOTAŞ, etc.) not shared with the public in a transparent manner?"

Emphasis on Turkish Grand National Assembly approval for strategic assets
In the proposal, the question was asked: "Why was the approval of the Turkish Grand National Assembly not sought for the sale or transfer of strategically important assets (Ports, Tank Pallet Factory, etc.)?"

Kaynak: CUMHA - CUMHUR HABER AJANSI